Biltmore
Strikes Deal With Union
Los Angeles Business Journal - June 6, 2005
By Andy Fixmer
In
another blow to the local hotel coalition whose members have
been boycotted for months, downtown's Millennium Biltmore
Hotel will no longer oppose the efforts of a union to line
up a contract with cities across the country.
In
return, the union will stop urging Biltmore clients to boycott
the hotel.
In
response to the deal, the Los Angeles Hotel Employers Council
- a group of seven hotels collectively bargaining with the
union - filed charges of unfair labor practices with the National
Labor Relations Board.
The
hotel owners, in a 4-3 vote, filed the charges claiming that
the union was improperly negotiating with individual properties
- something not allowed under collective bargaining agreements.
Fred Muir, a consultant to the hotel employers council, wouldn't
disclose which member hotels voted against filing the charges.
"It's
through their coercion of individual members of the council
that we believe violate National Labor Relations regulations,"
Muir said. "We also accuse them of not bargaining collectively
in good faith."
David
Koff, a research analyst for Unite HERE Local 11, defended
the outside agreements with hotel owners saying they did not
constitute an outside contract. "They are still entitled
to freedom of speech," Koff said. "They have agreed
to advocate for and recommend to the members of the employers
council that they should accept the
proposal the union
has had on the table for quite some time."
Ivan
Lee, the Biltmore's general manager, would neither confirm
nor deny the deal with the union, expected to be formally
announced at the end of today. "We don't have anything
to disclose at this stage," he said.
The
Biltmore's decision underscores an on-going dismantling of
what appeared to be a formidable alliance of hotel owners
who were seeking concessions from their employees when the
contract expired nearly two years ago.
Last
month, the owner of the Wilshire Grand agreed to similar terms
as the Biltmore. As members of the Los Angeles Hotel Employers
Council neither hotel can legally cut separate deals with
the union. However, the two owners have agreed to vote in
the union's favor.
Besides
the Biltmore and Wilshire Grand, six hotels that never joined
the employers council and instead bargained independently
with the union have all reached deals expiring in 2006 - the
date when contracts in large cities nationwide are set to
be renegotiated.
Muir
wouldn't address whether the NLRB filing indicated the employers
council is concerned the union has driven a wedge between
owners.
A
union-led boycott has also cut into the bottom lines of employer
council hotels, despite also reducing the hours of the workers
it represents. The union estimates the boycott has cost the
hotels between $10 million and $13 million in canceled room
nights, conventions, corporate meetings and banquets by 114
confirmed clients.
The
employers council has offered the union a five year contract
that would give all full-time employees a $1,000 signing bonus,
a 22 percent raise over the life of the contract and free
family health care.
Muir
said the offer expires Thursday. "It's a one-time offer,"
he said. "It won't get any better than this."
However,
the union hasn't shown interest in the offer. Koff said Unite
HERE is adamant the union be allowed to line up contracts
nationwide in order to counter the muscle of global hospitality
companies.
Another
reason the Biltmore conceded to union demands is because owner
WHB Corp., a subsidiary of London-based Millennium & Copthorne
Hotels PLC, has put the 683-room hotel up for sale.
Already,
two hotels that were members of the employers council have
been sold - cutting the number of member properties to seven
from nine.
The
new owners of the Hyatt Regency Los Angeles - now the Sheraton
Los Angeles - cut a separate deal and the new owner of the
St. Regis hotel in Century City plans to covert the building
to condominiums.
Also,
the owner of the Westin Century Plaza - a member of the employers
council - has put the property on the market, which could
result in another employer dropping out of the bargaining
group.
More
News About the Los Angeles Hotel Workers' Struggle for a Fair
Contract >>
|