Hotel
Union Says Lining Up Contract Dates Brings Leverage
Associated Press - June 15, 2005
By Alex Veiga
After
a yearlong contract battle, workers at seven hotels scaled
down their demands for more money to win a key concession
- a deal that expires next year.
Now,
contracts covering tens of thousands of hotel employees in
at least six major cities in this country and Canada are due
to expire throughout 2006, setting the stage for unions to
press prominent chains such as Starwood, Hyatt and Hilton
for gains on a national scale.
John
Wilhelm, co-president of UNITE Here, the union representing
bellmen, maids and other hotel industry employees, said it's
the only way for workers to take on the industry giants.
"They
band together to deal with us, whether we do or not, so we're
merely reacting to circumstances they created," he said.
Joe
McInerney, president and chief executive of the American Hotel
and Lodging Association, said the strategy might not work
because hotel operators negotiate separate contracts in each
city.
"You
have local unions that, really, the national does not control,"
McInerney said. "They make their own decisions. It's
very hard to tie something in New York with something in Hawaii."
In
Los Angeles, 2,700 hotel workers will start voting Wednesday
on the tentative contract. Under the deal, housekeepers, who
make up the bulk of union employees, would see their wages
increase an average of 65 cents an hour to about $11.75 by
April 16.
Agreements
are also set to expire next year in New York, Boston, Honolulu,
Chicago and Toronto. Including Los Angeles and smaller markets,
some 75,000 workers are covered by the contracts, Wilhelm
said.
Talks
are also under way in San Francisco to win a contract that
ends in 2006, but negotiations with 14 hotels have deadlocked.
"In
the past, the tradition was you had bargaining, and it would
be city by city. Now you don't," said Daniel Mitchell,
professor of management and public policy at the University
of California, Los Angeles.
Across
the country, hotel operators have fought the move by dangling
multiyear deals with long-term increases in wages and benefits.
It worked in Washington, where some 3,200 workers at Hilton,
Marriott and Omni hotels opted for a contract in January with
significant pay hikes that expires in 2007.
Employers
in Los Angeles tried a similar move last week, proposing a
deal that would have given workers an average $2.50 an hour
pay raise over four years. But the union didn't budge. On
the day the offer was set to expire, it called a strike at
the Hyatt hotel on Sunset Strip in West Hollywood.
Hotel
operators countered with a threat to lock out workers at the
other six hotels. Mediation by Mayor-elect Antonio Villaraigosa
and others led to the tentative agreement set to end in November
2006.
The
strategy echoes similar efforts in recent years by the Service
Employees International Union, which represents janitors.
McInerney
doesn't think contentious negotiations await the industry
next year.
"We
think that the union is going to be bargaining in good faith,"
McInerney said. "We feel there's an opportunity to get
a longer contract in 2006."
While
wages are likely to remain a local issue, Wilhelm said the
bunched up expiration dates will help talks on health care,
workers' compensation, job training and union organizing.
"If
the industry wants to create Armageddon in the hotel industry
in 2006, our customers will be confronted with rolling labor
disputes across North America," Wilhelm said. "That's
not necessary. Labor and management should recognize a common
interest."
Mitchell
suggests the union may have won a round by negotiating 2006
contract expiration dates.
"If
the management side can get its act together, that's another
story," he said.
More
News About the Los Angeles Hotel Workers' Struggle for a Fair
Contract >>
|