Minority
Workers A Driving Force in San Francisco Hotel Strike
Pacific News Service - November 10, 2004
By Peter Micek and R.M. Arrieta
At
a downtown Holiday Inn hotel miles away from the city's glamorous
5-star properties, Estradita Gayoso, a housekeeper at the
hotel walks the picket line every morning. She is one of the
approximately 4,000 city hotel workers who have been on strike
since Oct. 1. They are demanding a better-paying contract,
health care benefits and the right to renegotiate in two years
-- and are staunch in their resolve.
Gayoso,
originally from the Philippines, sat on the steps to a side
entrance to the hotel while taking a break. She has been a
cleaning person there for the past 30 years and says this
is her first strike. She says the long hours on the picket
line are worth it if she can obtain better health care benefits
for her and her two children.
"We
feel we have to do it," said Cecilia Morelos, also from
the Philippines. "It's not a very good experience."
She says her son had planned to go to college in December
but she says instead she told him that he must get a job.
"I'm locked out."
A
bartender, Mandy Tom remembers her grandfather came to the
United States from China to build the railroads, while her
grandmother worked in a sweatshop. The anti-union stance of
the hotels, she says, is a return to the past.
A
major sticking point of the negotiations has been the duration
of the contract. Union negotiators want the expiration to
coincide with the expiration of other hotel contracts across
the country, boosting their leveraging power nationwide.
"It's
a matter of survival. We can't just fight alone," said
Valerie Lapin, spokesperson for Unite Here, which represents
the hotel workers and has 440,000 working members nationwide.
"We
have to respond to the consolidation of hotel ownership,"
Lapin adds. "Decisions are being made at a corporate
level outside the city. These companies have tremendous power.
The only way to level that is to work with other locals around
the country."
Lapin said that in about 30 cities across the nation, locals
were doing a variety of activities, such as leafleting, to
show their support for San Francisco.
As
in San Francisco, workers in Los Angeles and Washington, D.C.,
have been in negotiations with hotel management for months.
They are trying to protect their health benefits, pensions,
wage hikes, workloads and the right to an agreement that expires
or can be reopened in 2006. Union leaders say a two-year contract
would begin to restore a balance of power with the national
hotel companies. They have the support of Mayor Gavin Newsom,
going against the San Francisco hotels that helped elect him.
Those
hotels, meanwhile, are pushing for a five-year contract.
Cornell
Fowler, who represents the San Francisco Multi-Employer Group
(SFMEG) -- the bargaining unit for 14 of San Francisco's leading
hotels -- said rank-and-file could care less about the two-year
sticking point.
Fowler
said that negotiating a two-year contract would be disastrous
for the city because conventions are planned two years in
advance.
"If
we agree to a two-year contract, no way would any conventions
come to San Francisco. Planners would not come here after
what they've seen happens during a strike," Fowler said.
In
Atlantic City, 10,000 Unite Here workers are walking the picket
line at seven casinos. They are looking to get a contract
expiration date of 2007 to merge with the expiration contract
date for Las Vegas workers. Again, the strategy is about power
through numbers.
Union
leaders say they learned much through last year's grocery
strike in California. Although the strike was effective, "it
wasn't enough," said Unite Here's Lapin. In that case,
some 70,000 workers went on strike. Although there was much
community support, information about the strike wasn't broad-based.
For
instance, in the Bay Area, few people were aware of the Southern
California strike.
"People
were still shopping in Bay Area grocery stores. When they
found out about that strike, they honored it here but by that
time, it was too late," Lapin said.
As
a result, the workers didn't have the power or the pull to
seriously bring store negotiators to the table.
The
hotels stringently try to dissuade workers that their union
is acting in their best interest. "I am very disappointed
to tell you," writes the hotel representative, "that
because of your union's continued insistence on a two-year
deal, the San Francisco Multi-Employer Group will not agree
to end this lockout."
Her
union said they might not return to work until January, Estradita
Gayoso said. "We don't know yet."
|