Fight
for National Leverage Will Continue
San Francisco Hotel Lockout Boxed Employers In
Labor Notes - January 2005
By David Bacon
Sometimes
the fate of a single battle foretells the outcome of a war,
long before it's over. The end of the San Francisco hotel
lockout promises to be this kind of watershed moment.
Beginning
last summer, UNITE HERE Local 2 skillfully exploited new political
fault lines, and the economics of the hospitality industry,
in its quest for bargaining leverage. In fact, leverage has
been at the heart of the whole conflict from the beginning,
a more important factor than even wage increases or benefits.
By
Labor Day, the union was locked in fractious negotiations
with the 14 hotels of the Multi Employer Group. This group
represents hotel operators, including multibillion-dollar
corporations like Hilton, Intercontinental, Starwood, and
Hyatt. The actual hotels themselves are owned by large investment
groups and pension funds.
LINING
UP CONTRACTS
While
the hotel operators were proposing tiny wage increases and
big hikes in medical insurance payments of up to $273 a month,
the key issue was the duration of the contract itself. Local
2 proposed that a new agreement expire in 2006, when similar
contracts with the same corporations expire in other cities
around the country, from New York to Chicago to Honolulu.
By
lining up the expiration dates, the union hoped to form a
common front of workers in major urban hotel markets, who
could act together to win a new standard of living that individual
local unions are too weak to gain alone. Barbara French, spokesperson
for the hotel group, called this idea "a non-starter
from the beginning."
At
the same time, another union bargaining proposal sought to
unify its membership base and consolidate community support.
Existing contract language protecting the rights of immigrants
would be combined with a new proposal to increase the diversity
of the hotel workforce, particularly by hiring African American
workers. Since the end of the 1960s-era civil rights demonstrations,
the largest of which focused on the Sheraton Palace Hotel,
Black employment in hotels has dropped to less than 6 percent.
In
September, the union launched a limited two-week strike against
four members of the employer group. The operators responded
with the first of a series of strategic missteps. They locked
the workers out of the other ten hotels in the group, and
then announced they'd extend the lockout beyond the strike's
end, so long as workers continued to demand the 2006 expiration
date.
HOTELS
MISCALCULATE AGAIN
Perhaps
thinking that workers would be reluctant to sacrifice paychecks
simply for an expiration date, hotels miscalculated again.
Elena Duran, speaking for many others, responded by saying
that "it's important for us to level the playing field."
Then
the union turned the lockout, intended as a pressure tactic
against workers, into a weapon against the operators themselves.
The 4,300 locked-out laborers mounted large, boisterous picket
lines.
Bullhorns
blasted their chants into the streets, and up into the hotel
rooms themselves, from early morning until after midnight.
Union members ate on the lines, often bringing their children
with them. Picketers reflected the city's diversity, with
all its colors and racial groups, speaking its bewildering
variety of languages.
Some
conventions pulled out of picketed hotels, while guests at
others complained about disruption inside, or just refused
to cross the lines. When operators brought in strikebreakers
from hotels in other cities, the union extended its picket
lines to Chicago, Honolulu, and Monterey, provoking one-day
shutdowns that previewed what coordinated bargaining in 2006
might accomplish.
POLITICAL
SUPPORT
Finally,
the union turned to the city itself. Green Party member Matt
Gonzalez, president of the Board of Supervisors, held a hearing
in which hundreds of workers overflowed the chambers and City
Hall itself.
San
Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom, hitherto quiet about the dispute,
decided to make his own attempt to settle it. Here the hotel
operators made their most disastrous miscalculation. Newsom
asked them to end the lockout, while he tried to make progress
in negotiations.
The
hotels turned him down flat. And when he said he would go
picket with the workers, a gesture with little actual economic
consequence, they criticized him publicly. Matt Adams, head
of the Multi Employer Group, wondered aloud in the San Francisco
Chronicle why the candidate whose campaign they'd financed
was not taking their side without question.
Newsom
went to the picket lines and announced he was pulling city
business from the hotels, encouraging all their clients to
go elsewhere. As complaints mounted from businesses around
the hotels at lost revenue and noise from the picket lines,
Newsom pulled the police away, pointing out that the operators
could end the ruckus any time they liked.
Finally,
the union and its allies, now including the mayor, drove a
wedge between the hotel operators, on the one hand, and the
owners, who gained nothing from the lockout's continuation.
It became obvious that the longer it went on, the more pressure
the operators themselves would feel.
After
five weeks, they finally let the workers return to their jobs,
with no agreement on the demand that the union give up the
2006 contract expiration date. When workers learned about
the operators' decision, many were reluctant to take the lines
down, since they'd proven so effective.
The
contract remains unresolved. As the workers' health insurance
was set to expire, Service Employees Local 250 convinced the
health care provider Kaiser Permanente, and then two other
health plans, to extend it. The state announced that since
workers were locked out, they'd receive unemployment benefits.
The
union, while it agreed not to strike for 60 days, has announced
it will continue the rest of its effective pressure campaign.
The operators still have deep reserves, and the hotels will
be able to function unhindered through their busiest season.
But
the employers' grand strategy to stop the union's march towards
greater bargaining leverage has unraveled, leaving the Multi
Employer Group disorganized and politically isolated.
|
Contract
Disputes Continue in Hotel Industry
By Sheila McClear
Conflicts continue to rock the tourism and hospitality
industry nationwide. Health care, wages, and contract
length-key issues in the recent San Francisco and Atlantic
City hotel and casino strikes-remain the major sticking
points in the industry.
Hotel chains are expecting workers to pony up an increasing
amount of cash for health care, while keeping their
wages frozen or granting only slight increases.
In New York City, UNITE HERE Local 6 members are on
strike at three hotels. Angered by the firing of 10
workers-reportedly due to union activity-as well as
management's refusal to recognize their union despite
a "yes" vote certified by the National Labor
Relations Board, workers have been on strike since September
22.
Hotel workers in Los Angeles and Washington, D.C. continue
to plug away at negotiations. A boycott of the affected
hotels in Los Angeles has reportedly begun to hurt business.
Nearly 850 riverboat casino workers in Indiana and East
Chicago, members of UNITE HERE Local 1, have authorized
a strike for the busy Martin Luther King Jr. Day weekend,
if the union gets no contract at four area casinos.
Key issues are affordable health insurance and fair
wages. The casinos are owned by some of the same corporations
involved in the October Atlantic City strike.
|
|