S.F.
Hotel Labor Dispute Taking Its Toll
Historians Move Event To San Jose -- Newsom Criticized
San Francisco Chronicle - February 18, 2005
By George Raine
The
drawn-out labor dispute hanging over San Francisco's hotel
industry is starting to have a serious economic impact, with
more than 2,000 convention visitors this week canceling their
visits and business interests blaming Mayor Gavin Newsom for
the mess.
A
gathering of 2,200 historians who were booked for four days
at the San Francisco Hilton for their association's annual
meeting has been moved to San Jose because of the contentious
labor dispute roiling the city's hospitality industry.
The
transfer of the meeting of the Organization of American Historians
from the Hilton to San Jose comes as the hotel workers' union,
in fruitless contract negotiations with 14 San Francisco hotels,
escalates its boycott of the facilities in the hope that economic
pressure will bring about a settlement. As a pressure tactic
on the negotiations, the unions are calling groups headed
for San Francisco, warning them of labor strife and asking
them to remove their business from the hotels in the dispute.
Leaders
of the union, Unite Here Local 2, had made it clear to the
historians that "there is a good chance they are going
to encounter a picket line'' if they went forward with the
March 31-April 3 meeting at the Hilton, said Mike Casey, Local
2 president. The association then polled 900 presenters and
other participants of the group's 98th annual meeting, and
found that three-quarters said they would not cross a picket
line.
"That
would have destroyed the integrity of the meeting,'' Lee Formwalt,
the association's executive director, said Thursday of the
prospect of a meeting lacking core participants. The board
eliminated other options -- remaining at the Hilton and canceling
the meeting -- and moved the sessions to the San Jose McEnery
Convention Center. Hotels, restaurants and other businesses
in San Francisco will lose an estimated $1.8 million from
a group of that size, according to the San Jose Convention
& Visitors Bureau.
The
executive board of the OAH, the largest professional organization
for the study and teaching of American history, based in Bloomington,
Ind., will also have financial exposure because of the move.
Formwalt said there are some $60,000 in unbudgeted expenses
because of the transfer, and he said the group, without an
escape clause in its contract with the Hilton, will owe damages
of $390,000. The group is negotiating the figure with the
hotel, said Formwalt. A Hilton spokeswoman did not return
a call for comment.
The
association posted notice of the change on its Web site on
Tuesday, but it has yet to remove a graphic showing the Golden
Gate Bridge and other iconic San Francisco scenes.
As
word of the loss of the large gathering of conferees spread,
San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom came under attack by business
interests because of the perception that his advocacy for
the workers and his personal boycott of the 14 hotels involved
in the labor dispute are supportive of the campaign to drive
business away from the facilities and thus the city.
"We
are extremely disappointed, and I think that the mayor by
boycotting the 14 hotels does a great disservice to this city,''
said Linda Mjellem, executive director of the Union Square
Association.
She
added, "The mayor is someone I personally have a lot
of resect for --
a
person of principle and conviction and great passion. But
I think this passion is counter-productive for the city. He
is a mayor for all people, and I think that passion needs
to apply for all people.''
Peter
Ragone, a spokesman for Newsom, said the criticism is misguided
since the historians did not make their decision based on
Newsom's policy.
"We
are not going to let criticism from either side stop us from
doing our best to keep both sides talking and moving toward
a resolution,'' he said.
Newsom,
however, figured Thursday in a second move of business from
a hotel. The San Francisco Business Times' fifth annual Mayors'
Economic Forecast, featuring Newsom and Oakland Mayor Jerry
Brown, was booked at the Hilton for Feb. 25. Publisher Mary
Huss said Thursday that, knowing Newsom's policy not to go
to the target hotels until the dispute is resolved and a contract
negotiated, she asked his staff if he would attend an event
at the Hilton. She was told he would not.
Some
1,000 people are expected for the Business Times' event, there
is no other San Francisco hotel that could accommodate a group
that large, so the newspaper moved the event to the Oakland
Convention Center. "It was a business decision,'' said
Huss. "I did not want to move the date for an economic
forecast. I have sponsors. It's a financial decision.''
The
transfer of the historians' meeting is a bonus for San Jose,
which was damaged by the cancellation of the National Hockey
League season in a barbed labor dispute. At the San Jose Convention
& Visitors Bureau, Daniel Fenton, the president and chief
executive, said, "It was clear (the historians) felt
the unsettled labor situation caused their members concern,
and therefore they felt San Jose was a great option for them.
Because of the proximity, I think they feel it is a good match.''
In
this case, the historians approached San Jose, but Fenton
said his staff is identifying groups, like educators, where
there would be a high degree of concern about an unsettled
labor situation.
He
added that the hotel labor dispute in San Francisco very likely
would not occur in San Jose. Six of 27 board members at the
Convention & Visitors Bureau are labor leaders, and the
vice chair, Phaedra Ells-Lamkins, heads the South Bay Labor
Council. "We have a philosophy that labor is a partner
of ours, '' said Fenton.
Meantime,
Casey, of Local 2, agreed that the boycott is costing San
Francisco money, but said, "We are not going to give
in until they give us a fair deal. We are asking for a very
reasonable settlement, and the corporate owners (of the hotels)
are fighting us tooth and nail.''
He
said union members are making telephone calls to planners
of events booked up to six months or more from now. He said
he saw no hint of a settlement any time soon.
The
14 hotels, in a bargaining group, and Local 2 are at odds
over wages, health care coverage, the length of a contract
and other issues. There was a two-week strike against four
of the hotels that began Sept. 29, after which the 10 other
hotels in the group locked out their workers. The 4,300 employees
at all 14 were locked out until Nov. 20, when the sides agreed
to a 60-day cooling-off period and the workers returned. That
has expired, and both sides say that neither a strike nor
a lockout is imminent.
In
addition to the Hilton, the other hotels in the group are
the Argent, Crown Plaza, Fairmont, Four Seasons, Grand Hyatt,
Holiday Inn Civic Center, Holiday Inn Express & Suites
Fisherman's Wharf, Holiday Inn at Fisherman's Wharf, the Palace,
Hyatt Regency, Mark Hopkins, Omni and Westin St. Francis.
|